Golf Arizona Forum
Oops! It does not look like you are logged in.

Please note: This is a Completely Free Forum

Golf Arizona Forum


 
HomeHome  CalendarCalendar  GalleryGallery  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  

Share | 
 

 Tiger Vs Sergio PART 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
Golfarizona
Admin
avatar

Posts : 371
Points : 2698
REP : 4
Join date : 2012-10-07
Age : 34
Location : Peoria

PostSubject: Tiger Vs Sergio PART 2   Thu May 16, 2013 8:49 pm

Let’s give the last word in this Mount Rushmore edition of he said/he said to Tiger Woods. It seems Sergio Garcia didn’t know all the facts.

It turns out Woods did hear a marshal say that El Nino had already hit his second shot at the par-5 second hole early on Day 3 at The Players Championship.

It also seems virtually certain that Woods could not see Garcia in the fairway when he pulled a club from his bag and approached his golf ball that was in the trees left of the second fairway.

“From where (Woods) was there is no way he could have seen Sergio,” marshal John North told GolfChannel.com on Tuesday.

We’ve seen the split-screen footage of this episode more times than the Zapruder film – Woods eying his lie and the trees ahead, Garcia poised over his ball, Woods slipping a head cover off a fairway wood which caused the crowd to react.

The timing is all right there in HD quality. What has been open to viral, and sometimes vicious, debate for five days is what happened next.

When Round 3 was suspended by Saturday’s storm, Garcia told Golf Channel’s Steve Sands: “I think he must have pulled a 5-wood or 3-wood out and obviously everybody started screaming, so that didn’t help very much. It was unfortunate. I try to respect everyone as much as possible out there. I try to be careful what I do to make sure it doesn’t bother the other players.”

Woods responded when play ultimately ended in twilight on Saturday: “He doesn’t know all the facts. The marshal said he’d already hit and I pulled the club . . . I heard his comments afterwards. It’s not surprising he’s complaining about something.”

But it was North – the chief marshal for the first, second and third holes at TPC Sawgrass last week – who turned the episode into a bona fide controversy, however unwittingly.

“Nothing was said to us and we certainly said nothing to (Woods),” North told Sports Illustrated. “I was disappointed to hear him make those remarks. We’re there to help the players and enhance the experience of the fans. He was saying what was good for him. It lacked character.”

On Tuesday night, however, North was not as certain that no marshal had advised Woods that Garcia had already played. Although he said he wasn’t misquoted by Sports Illustrated he did say his quotes were taken “slightly” out of context.

“I didn’t want to impugn the character of Tiger Woods or the Sports Illustrated writer. I was just answering a hypothetical question,” said North, who has been a marshal at The Players for 30 years. “I cannot unequivocally say nothing was said (to Woods).”

Less than 12 hours later, Brian Nedrich could equivocally say that Woods received the “all clear” from a marshal. “I was the one Tiger heard say that Sergio had hit,” Nedrich told the Florida Times-Union.

While the timing remains somewhat unclear, Nedrich – who said he was 10 to 12 feet away from Woods – informed a fellow marshal that Garcia had played his second shot.

“There was a lot going on, as usual, when Tiger plays,” he said. “Then, he’s trying to have the concentration he needs to win a tournament. It’s easy to get small details out of whack when things happen so fast.”

At the risk of playing both judge and jury, the witness may step down, the case is dismissed.

If this doesn’t clear up at least this portion of the controversy for the conspiracy theorist then nothing will. Although the timing is suspect, Woods heard the marshal say Garcia had already played.

We’ve learned from this ugly episode that, in this case, it seems it is the marshals who needed a “Quiet, please” sign; and that the smallest amount of contrition could have gone a long way.

Woods supporters say he did nothing wrong, therefore he had nothing to apologize for. While that may follow the letter of the law it does little to promote good will within the ropes and stretches the boundaries of courtesy.

In this case, Woods accidently and inadvertently pulled a club while Garcia was preparing to hit and caused a distraction. Regardless of intent or culpability, a quick apology as the two headed up the second fairway may well have cut short a needless controversy.

That, however, was never option. Not with this two-ball.

“We didn’t do a lot of talking,” Woods said on Saturday when asked if he and Garcia discussed the incident.

Woods and Garcia don’t like each other. In related news, the sun will set in the west. Still, would this issue not have faded like Saturday’s sunset had both players shown a modicum of civility?

But then it’s hard to blame Woods for going lock-jaw considering Garcia’s take on the row on Sunday, some 24 hours after the fact.

“I'm not going to lie, he's not my favorite guy to play with,” Garcia told Sky Sports. “He's not the nicest guy on Tour.”

Passion is one thing, petulance is an entirely different animal.

Competing personalities butt heads in all walks of life, but on Sunday, on Mother’s Day, the Spaniard violated a central theme of civilized society – he had nothing nice to say, and yet he kept talking.


-GolfChannel

_________________
G15 w/ProForce 65g Stiff Flex
07 Burner w/ Proforce 76g Stiff Flex
Adams A4 19* w/Proforce 86g stiff
G20 4-7 iron
I20 8-PW(bent to G20 specs)
Cleveland cg16 50*; cg14 54*; cg14 58*
Ping Scottsdale "Y Worry"

Contact us with any questions comments or concerns at:

golfarizonaforum@gmail.com or here on the Forum
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://golfarizona.forumotion.com
ma1r1k2us

avatar

Posts : 68
Points : 1908
REP : 2
Join date : 2012-12-30
Age : 37
Location : Maricopa, AZ

PostSubject: Re: Tiger Vs Sergio PART 2   Fri May 17, 2013 5:39 pm

I followed this a little but not too much. I think it would have been smoothed over quicker if Sergio would have taken a more passive approach. Something like I don't know what happened the crowd rumbled a bit while I was swinging and wait for the response. It's a lot harder to apologize when you start out defensive and are proved to be right then if it sounds like he is just trying to figure out why it happened. I'd like to think I would feel the same if it was reversed roles but who knows

_________________
Nike SQ Machspeed 10.5 stock XStiff shaft
Nike DyMo 15* 3 wood Stiff shaft
Taylormade Burner 19* and 22* hybrid
Nike SlingShot 4d Irons 6-AW
Cleveland 588 54* wedge
Cleveland CG14 58* wedge
Nike Method Core Drone
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Golfarizona
Admin
avatar

Posts : 371
Points : 2698
REP : 4
Join date : 2012-10-07
Age : 34
Location : Peoria

PostSubject: Re: Tiger Vs Sergio PART 2   Mon May 20, 2013 9:00 pm

Ya Sergio is sort of a cry baby.

_________________
G15 w/ProForce 65g Stiff Flex
07 Burner w/ Proforce 76g Stiff Flex
Adams A4 19* w/Proforce 86g stiff
G20 4-7 iron
I20 8-PW(bent to G20 specs)
Cleveland cg16 50*; cg14 54*; cg14 58*
Ping Scottsdale "Y Worry"

Contact us with any questions comments or concerns at:

golfarizonaforum@gmail.com or here on the Forum
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://golfarizona.forumotion.com
ma1r1k2us

avatar

Posts : 68
Points : 1908
REP : 2
Join date : 2012-12-30
Age : 37
Location : Maricopa, AZ

PostSubject: Re: Tiger Vs Sergio PART 2   Fri May 24, 2013 6:22 am

Now he is in even hotter water because of the joke fail...should have learned from Fuzzy it's just not the type of joke that goes over well unless it is a life long friend who knows you well enough to know it is a joke. Anyone outside of that is not going to take it as good natured fun. scratch

_________________
Nike SQ Machspeed 10.5 stock XStiff shaft
Nike DyMo 15* 3 wood Stiff shaft
Taylormade Burner 19* and 22* hybrid
Nike SlingShot 4d Irons 6-AW
Cleveland 588 54* wedge
Cleveland CG14 58* wedge
Nike Method Core Drone
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Golfarizona
Admin
avatar

Posts : 371
Points : 2698
REP : 4
Join date : 2012-10-07
Age : 34
Location : Peoria

PostSubject: Re: Tiger Vs Sergio PART 2   Fri May 24, 2013 9:54 pm

On ya. He totally needs to just shut up

_________________
G15 w/ProForce 65g Stiff Flex
07 Burner w/ Proforce 76g Stiff Flex
Adams A4 19* w/Proforce 86g stiff
G20 4-7 iron
I20 8-PW(bent to G20 specs)
Cleveland cg16 50*; cg14 54*; cg14 58*
Ping Scottsdale "Y Worry"

Contact us with any questions comments or concerns at:

golfarizonaforum@gmail.com or here on the Forum
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://golfarizona.forumotion.com
Twiddly

avatar

Posts : 141
Points : 2102
REP : 5
Join date : 2012-10-13

PostSubject: Re: Tiger Vs Sergio PART 2   Sun May 26, 2013 8:54 pm

ma1r1k2us wrote:
Now he is in even hotter water because of the joke fail...should have learned from Fuzzy it's just not the type of joke that goes over well unless it is a life long friend who knows you well enough to know it is a joke. Anyone outside of that is not going to take it as good natured fun. scratch

Ya! Him and Tigers old caddie should hook up talk for a bit. I bet they would both get some laughs between the two of them

_________________
Taylormade RBZ
R9 3Wood Stiff Stock Shaft
Titliest 909 19* Hybrid
Titliest AP2 3-PW
Vokey 52*
Cleveland 58*
Scotty Cameron Newport putter
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Tiger Vs Sergio PART 2   

Back to top Go down
 
Tiger Vs Sergio PART 2
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Sergio Garcia makes racist remark when asked about Tiger
» which part of toronto is grass roots canada located?
» Food for Thought - What's stopping you from being a Tiger Woods
» Target Line or Tiger Line
» need part for caberg helmet

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Golf Arizona Forum :: Golf News-
Jump to: